With
all of the uproar over President Bush's admission that he broke the
law by authorizing the NSA to spy on American citizens, it's a good
thing to remember that the Declaration of Independence was a radical
call
for government that was subject to the law, just like its
citizens. The founders objected to arbitrary acts and to laws passed
without representation from the governed.
Today
we have a supposedly-conservative President who believes that his
office allows him to determine what's necessary, whether or not it's
legal. Many conservative media outlets are claiming that FISA does
allow the President’s acts, but Glenn
Greenwald has pointed out that all of them are citing a dishonest
mis-quote of the law.
Attorney
General Alberto
Gonzalez acknowledged that the NSA's eavesdropping is illegal
under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), but claimed
that FISA was outdated, saying that “we need to have
the speed and agility and utilize all the tools available to this
president in confronting this enemy,"
Condoleeza
Rice also seems to believe that the fact that the President
believes the law is obsolete is sufficient reason for the President
to disobey it:
The
Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act...which came out of 1978 at a
time when the principal concern was, frankly, the activities of
people on behalf of foreign governments...very different from the
kind of urgency of detection and thereby protection of a country that
is needed today. And so the president has drawn on additional
authorities that he has under the Constitution and under other
statutes. [emphasis added]
Gonzales claims that the Congressional
Resolution authorizing the use of force in Iraq and Afghanistan also
authorized the President’s new surveillance powers. Democratic
and Republican Congressional leaders denied
that:
Wisconsin Sen.
Russell Feingold (D) said..."Nobody, nobody, thought...that this
was an authorization to allow a wiretapping against the law of the
United States...The president has, I think, made up a law that we
never passed."
Sen. Arlen Specter (R-Pa.), chairman
of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he intends to hold hearings.
"They talk about constitutional authority," Specter said.
"There are limits as to what the president can do."
Sen. Lindsey
Graham (R) said that If Bush is allowed to decide unilaterally who the
potential terrorists are, he in essence becomes the court; he
also said that “we cannot set aside the rule of law in a time of
war."
Several Administration officials cited
the need for a faster response to intelligence about threats, even
though FISA's
“emergency orders” section allows surveillance to begin
immediately as long as one of the FISA judges is informed that
surveillance is being initiated and an application for a warrant is
submitted within 72 hours. And according to Talking Points Memo,
1,727 applications for warrants were made in 2003, of which 79 were
modified before being approved, 4 were denied, and all of the rest
were approved.
So Bush is claiming that he needs the power to define
whether a law is relevant in order to fight terrorism, even though the existing law clearly is
adequate. He also claims that the program was narrowly designed and used in a manner
"consistent with U.S. law and the Constitution," and we are supposed to trust his good will and judgment. Yet in the meantime:
The Pentagon's newest counterterrorism
agency...is carrying
out intelligence collection, analysis and operations within the
United States and abroad, including reports
on peaceful civilian protests and demonstrations, and the
Pentagon
acknowledges that it has been violating regulations that require it
to purge records from investigations that turn out to be
irrelevant within three months.
Department
of Homeland Security agents questioned a college student at his
home after he requested a copy of Mao's Little Red Book to prepare a
paper on fascism and totalitarianism.
Bush says that the Constitution is "just a goddamned piece of paper!”
James Madison said that "In
framing a government which is
to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this: you
must first enable the government to control the governed; and in the next
instance oblige it to control itself."
Someone needs to tell this George that he's the President, not the King, and he should stop acting like George III, who presided over England's role in the American Revolution.
Update: The DHS agents visiting the student who sought Mao's Little Red Book story is a hoax