"Possibly white guilt's worst
effect is that it does not permit whites--and nonwhites--to appreciate
something extraordinary: the fact that whites in America, and even
elsewhere in the West, have achieved a truly remarkable moral
transformation...There are no serious advocates of white supremacy in America today"
The Absurd category here started as a place to put the most outrageous wingnuttery, but for a while it seemed like everything that the media reported from or about the Administration qualified, and I started using Disgraceful instead. But ever since Bush's approval ratings have reached a level only two or three times what they should be, the most ridiculous instances of wild-ass-craziness in "respectable" media outlets seem to have become less common.
Until this: Whiskey Bar: Losing Ugly discusses Tuesday's Wall Street Journal op-ed from Shelby Steele, a research fellow
at the Hoover Institution and the author of the newly-released book: "White Guilt: How Blacks and Whites Together Destroyed the
Promise of the Civil Rights Era." In his White Guilt and the Western Past editorial Steele argues that we're losing in Iraq because we feel so guilty over our past racism that we can't go to war "with enough ferocity to win."
"The collapse of white
supremacy--and the resulting white guilt--introduced a new mechanism of
power into the world: stigmatization with the evil of the Western past."
"America's act of going to war can
have legitimacy only if it seems to be an act of social work--something
that uplifts and transforms the poor brown nation"
Whiskey Bar's Billmon makes a case for this as "a fairly desperate attempt to think up an excuse for the Iraq fiasco -- one that doesn't involve admitting the invasion was a really stupid idea, stupidly executed." But I wonder if Steele is laying a foundation to attack those who will be horrified by our upcoming use of WMD's nuclear weapons in Iran. It's the "don't let your white guilt prevent you from seeing the need for nuclear genocide" defense.